By-Election Results From Castle Baynard & Cripplegate Underline The Urgent Need For Democratic Reform In The City Of London

Given that the leader of the City of London council Chris Hayward has been personally involved in a drive to register yet more undemocratic business voters in the Castle Baynard ward, the 11.9% turnout for the 23 March 2023 by-election there leaves the policy chair with yet more egg on his face. Hayward is registered as a voter in Castle Baynard but with a firm that doesn’t appear on his register of interests, so presumably he doesn’t work for them – but they still provide him with a business vote enabling him to stand for office from Broad Street ward.

The Castle Baynard by-election was triggered by the resignation of Martha Grekos who’d been bullied into giving up her seat by a group of freemasons – including council leader Chris Hayward – who dominate this anachronistic local authority. The by-election was called at short notice, ensuring – as we have already reported – that only freemasons posing as ‘independents’ would be standing to replace Grekos.

In March 2022, Michael Hudson failed to get elected in Castle Baynard with 177 votes (turnout last year was 27.95%) – but in the 2023 by-election last week with his support nearly cut in half, this mason was ‘elected’ with business votes that failed to go beyond double figures. Hudson’s closest rival, Edward Goodchild got only 47 votes – but perhaps more shocking is the fact that outsider candidate Scott Longman* beat another longtime Guildhall establishment councillor Kevin Everett, who like Hudson lost his seat last year, into fourth place. Longman got 32 votes and Everett 21.

In total less than 200 votes were cast in the Castle Baynard by-election and in part this was because people did not want to vote for any of the candidates since all of them clearly wanted to cozy up to the discredited masonic elements within the Guildhall establishment who had bullied Martha Grekos out of her seat. Indeed, just before the election LibDem councillor for Reading and business voter in Castle Baynard, James Moore. could be seen on Twitter complaining to his party’s Cities of London and Westminster figurehead – Edward Lucas – that he would have to abstain. While Moore makes it clear he can’t support any of those standing, he doesn’t explain the reason for his views.

The City establishment falsely claims to be ‘non-partisan’ with the majority of its vastly over-numbered 125 councillors pretending to be ‘independents’ – although in reality most aren’t. But here is a business voter asking for transparently ‘partisan’ candidates. Currently the council has members who belong to the Labour Party, Temple & Farringdon Together and the Castle Baynard Independents Party (Michael Hudson is one of its officers but for last week’s vote he stood as an ‘independent’).

In the residential ward of Cripplegate the turnout was a rather less scandalous 29.2% on 23 March 2023, although this was down from 45.46% in March 2022. The by-election was held after Sue Pearson was voted into the position of alderwoman (senior councillor) for Cripplegate on 15 September 2022 and thereby vacated her common council seat.

Only in a rotten borough like the City of London would a seat in the ward currently most likely to elect opposition councillors to a nominally ‘non-partisan’ council be left vacant for nearly 5 months longer than its equivalent post in Castle Baynard, where a Guildhall establishment ‘ma(so)n’ was much more likely to be elected if opposition candidates weren’t given time to organise. If the Guildhall establishment can organise an election in a week or two in Castle Baynard, they can do it anywhere, they just prefer not to in a ward where they’re unlikely to see a candidate they favour returned.

All three Cripplegate candidates were independents who campaigned on the basis of standing up for residents whose needs and views are rarely considered by the 80% of councillors elected on business votes and who instead champion the interests of the financial city. The outcome of the election was determined largely by how embedded each of the candidates was in the local community. Dawn Frampton won with 369 votes.

Frampton made it clear in her election material that she’d grown up in the City and lived in it all her life. She’s well known in Cripplegate as a friendly and helpful neighbour but also as someone unafraid to stand up in meetings and demand overdue repairs for council flats or facilities for young people. Frampton put more effort into her campaign than the other two candidates – leafletting more extensively and creating a website, as well as holding a meet and greet event in Cripplegate’s Sir Ralph Perrin Centre.

Lionel Meyringer who has lived in the Barbican for 20 years polled a respectable – considering the small size of the electorate – 214 votes, although beyond the Barbican Estate his leafleting was patchy. Many of those we know on the Golden Lane council estate received no election material from him or his rival Angus Myline – and as far as we can determine, neither of them put up websites. At hustings and the wardmote, Meyringer was very much out-classed as a public speaker by Frampton and Myline. That said, he came across as pleasant and sincere, as well as someone who had put in lots of hard graft for his immediate community as secretary of his Barbican block house group and with the Barbican Association. We thought Meyringer would have made a good councillor but that Frampton will make an even better one.

Angus Myliner moved to the Barbican about 4 years ago and that was reflected in the 46 votes he received. Most Cripplegate voters want councillors who will work hard and stand up for them at the Guildhall. Experience has taught voters in the ward that those they can trust to serve them well are usually those who’ve lived in the ward or neighbouring Aldersgate for at least a decade or two. For a good number of voters, Frances Leach who moved to the Barbican shortly before being elected in Cripplegate on a Labour ticket in 2022 hasn’t been visible enough at the Guildhall supporting residents in committee meetings in the way her two Labour colleagues and the other independents in Cripplegate do. To many of her constituents, Leach appears to have treated becoming a City councillor as a stepping stone to other things.** Whether Myliner would have ended up being perceived in the same way is impossible to say – but once bitten twice shy!

That said, it’s time to do away with the undemocratic political system in the City of London that results in elections where it is often difficult to discern the differences between all the ‘independent’ candidates and the political blocks they fall into. The business vote should have been abolished long ago, it doesn’t exist anywhere else in the UK and it shouldn’t exist in the City of London! To sections of the financial city, the business vote may look like a Smithfield bargain*** at resident’s expense but ultimately it serves to bring disrepute on the square mile, and so the financial city – as well as residents – would be better off without it.

Cripplegate’s new councillor Dawn Frampton.

Notes

*In the near future we intend to post on Scott Longman’s attempts to make money out of the Freedom of the City of London award, something that makes him deeply unpopular in many financial city circles despite his ongoing failed attempts to ingratiate himself with the Guildhall establishment.

As we noted in our previous post on the Castle Baynard by-election, given how Longman is positioned it is possible that protest votes are what took him to the not quite dizzying heights of having 32 marks against his name in the ballot. That said, those who supported Longman as a candidate by nominating him are certainly curious. Longman was proposed by Jason Miles Dibley – seemingly founding director of QCC counter surveillance companies registered in Wells, Somerset (as are his other companies) but based at 1 Hind Court, 149 Fleet Street. Longman was seconded by Eamonn James Mullally, a City of London councillor for Farringdon Within and spouse of Rt Rev. and Rt Hon. the Lord Bishop of London Sarah Mullally.

Longman’s other nominees were Georgina King, Alberto Costa and Md Anamol Hq. Strangely, an Alberto Costa was a nominee for Saif Ahmad Masood in the City’s November 2022 Bridge & Bridge Without by-election – where Longman also stood unsuccessfully. We have yet to determine if the Masood Bridge nominee is the same person as the Alberto Costa who nominated Longman for last week’s election in Castle Baynard; or if one or both of these nominees is the same person as the Alberto Costa who is Conservative MP for South Leicestershire.

** Cripplegate ‘independent’ Paul Singh was elected in 2022 largely because there were eight seats up for grabs and ten candidates, two of whom were clearly tied to the Guildhall establishment and didn’t live in Cripplegate or neighbouring Aldersgate (the ward that – alongside Cripplegate – the Barbican Estate is split between). Singh took a tenancy on a Barbican flat for the purpose of standing as a candidate in Cripplegate where he knew he’d have a better chance of being elected if he appeared to be a resident, but it seems he uses his Breton House pied-à-terre no more than occasionally.

The fact that Singh is obviously commuting in and out of London hasn’t gone down fabulously well with Cripplegate voters but he does appear to work reasonably hard at being a councillor and certainly puts himself about. Singh is a surveyor and seems to have a small business advising on claims. There are persistent rumours that it is family money from small scale property developments that pay for Singh’s Barbican flat – although we’ve not seen any documentation to substantiate these claims.

If Singh stands for re-election in Cripplegate it will be interesting to see how these factors play out with voters – although that will to a large degree depend upon who he is standing against and if he does anything that particularly annoys residents before another vote. For example, if Singh were to be seen working with Ian Luder to get Sushil Saluja elected as Luder’s replacement as alderman (senior councillor) in Castle Baynard, this would go down very badly with a section of Cripplegate voters.

***A Smithfield bargain is a bargain in which the buyer of something is taken advantage of; a rip-off. This now archaic term derives from the Smithfield area in the City of London, where fairs were formerly held and which the City council is currently attempting to transform from a meat market into a cultural quarter – as part of its ‘destination city’ vanity project.

13 thoughts on “By-Election Results From Castle Baynard & Cripplegate Underline The Urgent Need For Democratic Reform In The City Of London

  1. Laughable Longman as he is known behind many tittering hands is a buffoon he has been busted out by various City of London livery companies for bad behaviour and certain livery company halls where he used to run networking events and try to them not pay them what he owes. Endless debts, sums promised and not paid. It’s laughable the corporation let’s a complete con man fraud artist like this even stand at all in these elections? They have no oversight or control it seems over who stands. Word on the street in The City of London is that an ex partner has approached the relevant authorities with nauseating detail about his exploits – the end is well and truly near for the turbo faker, catch me if you can weirdo merchant

    Like

  2. Not sure that your remarks about Frankie Leach recognise her day job in disaster relief, especially as there have been several natural and other disasters since last March. However, anyone who has seen Frankie questioning the Chair of Policy in Common Council won’t be doubting her commitment to residents.
    23 March was always the likely date for the Cripplegate by election, as that was probably the most convenient date after publication of the new ward list. Yes, it might be a rotten borough and its ward lists should be regularly updated but surely it’s better for residents who moved here in 2022 – and not those who’ve moved out since 2021 – to be able vote last week? With five months to prepare, there was no reason why, unlike in Castle Baynard, anyone wishing to stand wouldn’t have been able to. The decision to hold the Castle Baynard by election with such little notice failed, not surprisingly, to attract a diversity of candidates.
    Cripplegate residents can be very pleased with the performance of their “8+1” at the first anniversary of their election. Whilst they may include one mason, Aldersgate residents now seem to be represented again by two masons.

    Like

    1. If you look at what is said about Leach you’ll see it is about public perception of her rather than her actual performance. Perceptions have an impact and what is said there was put in mainly to explain the lack of support for Myliner. That said, your comments about the difficulties of her day job in the last year might be taken to indicate the issue goes beyond perceptions and the piece might have been more critical and less cautious in its wording. That’s not to say Leach isn’t doing an important day job but some residents are more focused on what she does at the council and their perception is she doesn’t work as hard for them as her ward colleagues – admittedly we haven’t heard this from anyone we know to be a Labour Party member and maybe your involvements there means you hear this less loudly than we do. Also obviously even if her performance at the Guildhall has been hampered by unexpected demands from her day job, she was still a better choice for residential voters than the two who didn’t get in last year. Totally agree that overall Cripplegate residents can be very pleased with the performance of their ward councillors since the last City-wide election.

      Like

      1. Sometimes it might simply be best to ask from whom is EC1 meant to be reclaimed and move on. This might be one of those times. You told us Martha Grekos resigned because of the bullying she suffered in Guildhall – after your 16 July comments – but what are you doing here, if not bullying?

        Like

      2. A bully is a person who harasses, abuses, intimidates, or coerces people, especially those with less power than they have or those considered weaker or vulnerable in some way. Can you explain how that applies here?

        Like

  3. Isn’t bullying also publicly criticising someone without first having given that person the opportunity to respond to that criticism?
    By the way could you say from whom EC1 is being reclaimed and, also, for whom?

    Like

    1. You are rather too fond of rhetorical questions – and this may sometimes make it look like you don’t know things you shouldn’t need to ask. As you probably know, among other things we want to reclaim EC1 and beyond from the City of London Corporation which has suffered civic capture by elements within the financial city. This would benefit the many not just locally but worldwide given that the council’s neo-liberal lobbying is global. One of the ways this should be done is by abolishing the business vote – and as you’re involved with Fair Square Mile, we also know that’s one of many issues on which you disagree with what gets written here.

      Likewise elected officials and lobbyists should expect scrutiny and criticism and so it is not bullying to do this and not give them the opportunity to respond to it first. It is normal democratic political practice – something rarely found in the City of London, which lacks proper checks and balances. Similar criticism has been aired in other comments left on this blog, one was responded to in this way: “your verbiage… is implicitly about balance. Since the City of London Corporation has a massive lobbying and PR machine including press officers, and this blog is done without payment in our spare time, the imbalance lies somewhere very different to your implicit suggestion.” To state the obvious, more power for the many means less power for the few who currently have far too much power.

      Further, it is not bullying to say – as your comments here imply given you bring the matter up – that some Cripplegate residents perceive Frances Leach as not working as hard for them as their other ward councillors. Your use of the issue of bullying looks to me like the rhetoric of someone desperate to win an argument without thinking through the issues or addressing the matter of power relations.

      As for Martha Grekos, I would stand by everything that’s said in the first post about her. The more recent posts about Grekos being bullied were not written by the person who wrote that post but you can see that even in one of these later posts our collective differences with her are flagged up – with passing criticism of her support for BIDs. Although all those who work on this blog agree that the City of London is a rotten borough and is in desperate need of democratic reform, we have a range of opinions on all sorts of matters and are tolerant of a diversity of views. If you check back through our posts you’ll also see we have a track record of supporting those with whom we have major political differences when issues on which we have principled positions are at stake.

      That said, it is still tedious to have to explain to you and others that it is not bullying not to seek out the views of those with a stranglehold on the dominant channels of communication with regard to what we have to say about them before publishing it here. We do not support the status quo in the City of London, so you’ll be repeatedly disappointed if you expect us to behave as if we do.

      Like

      1. Fair Square Mile was a campaign around the registration of worker voters to try to ensure that City workers were aware of worker votes and that employers distributed all their votes in a way which is representative as possible of their entire work forces, particularly low paid workers. It was nothing to do with supporting the worker vote, as such, but, as it exists, trying ensure fairness. The changes which the former Labour Councillor, Fr William Taylor’s campaign obtained from government in the 2002 Act were an improvement but didn’t secure an obligation for a representative distribution. Until worker votes are abolished campaigning to ensure maximum diversity, as well as giving City Corporation workers a vote, seems fair as well, particularly if it helps removes some of the more reactionary business members.

        It would be interesting to know when City Corporation wasn’t held “captive by elements within the financial city” though. Whether or not you support the status quo in the City of London is really irrelevant. Change won’t come through ReclaimEC1 or me. It will either come from government or from within Guildhall. The likelihood is that it will be the latter, so why attack – bully then – the elected members who are trying to effect change?

        Like

      2. We criticise elected members doing things we don’t like – that is normal democratic practice not bullying – “bullying” and “attack” are emotive terms that you chose to use and many will find problematic. Going back through these comments you seem to be upset by what was said about Frances Leach. These are the two sentences in the post that seem to have led to you using the words “bullying” and “attack” to describe this blog: “For a good number of voters, Frances Leach who moved to the Barbican shortly before being elected in Cripplegate on a Labour ticket in 2022 hasn’t been visible enough at the Guildhall supporting residents in committee meetings in the way her two Labour colleagues and the other independents in Cripplegate do. To many of her constituents, Leach appears to have treated becoming a City councillor as a stepping stone to other things.” Your response is completely disproportionate.

        Like

  4. Scott Longman’s name comes up negatively in the City circles regularly across livery clerks (he was dumped out of The Blacksmiths Livery company some years ago in dubious circumstances mainly revolving around the use of a non-business livery company membership for his personal financial gain), livery hall caterers (his name is in effect black listed for harassing young male staff whilst intoxicated) and the City of London town clerk’s office (they are investigating him in 2023, interesting to see if any action is taken or if they are just going through the motions. A recent development of note is his being appointed as a judge for the Business Champions Awards – his profile makes for interesting reading – the mother of all faked CVs. He was never appointed as a City of London Ambassador in 2012, as the Guildhall will confirm whenever anyone rings or emails them to check before passing money to him for his “services”. He claims to be the founder and the CEO of the AIDE Foundation, nobody has ever seen this or heard of it or been able to identify what or where or who it is or what it does. It is high time Longman attacked buffets elsewhere, his City of London tat-peddling days are slowly coming to an end in 2023 and the word on the street is his website is down and an angry client is after him (one imagines for providing no service or product of any value or worth, after taking money off them) and is getting quite aggressive with him. Truly a basket case/disaster waiting to happen! When will the other livery companies and ward clubs he is in kick him out and bar him once and for all like the vagabond that is really is?

    Like

Leave a comment